Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Seeking implementation of the order of CESTAT - Right of Revenue to file an appeal in the HC against the order of tribunal - The right of the petitioner to insist on the respondent's complying with Ext.P7 order will arise only in the event of the respondents not filing an appeal within the statutory period provided for the same or if an appeal, when preferred within the said time, is dismissed by the appellate authority. - Prudence would dictate, therefore, that this court refrain from issuing peremptory directions at the said stage of the proceedings by following the well settled principles - HC
Seeking implementation of the order of CESTAT - Right of Revenue to file an appeal in the HC against the order of tribunal - The right of the petitioner to insist on the respondent's complying with Ext.P7 order will arise only in the event of the respondents not filing an appeal within the statutory period provided for the same or if an appeal, when preferred within the said time, is dismissed by the appellate authority. - Prudence would dictate, therefore, that this court refrain from issuing peremptory directions at the said stage of the proceedings by following the well settled principles - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.