Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Rejection of SVLDR scheme - it is clear that any investigation pertaining to the period from 2014 to 2016 by the authorities should not affect the declarations made by the petitioner in respect of the period from April, 2016 onwards. The contention of the respondents (Revenue) is that the investigation pertains to the period 2016–17 also and the respondents are yet to quantify and communicate the amount due. - . The Designated Committee is directed to decide the petitioner’s applications/declarations after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - HC
Rejection of SVLDR scheme - it is clear that any investigation pertaining to the period from 2014 to 2016 by the authorities should not affect the declarations made by the petitioner in respect of the period from April, 2016 onwards. The contention of the respondents (Revenue) is that the investigation pertains to the period 2016–17 also and the respondents are yet to quantify and communicate the amount due. - . The Designated Committee is directed to decide the petitioner’s applications/declarations after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
