Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Rejection of SVLDR scheme - it is clear that any investigation pertaining to the period from 2014 to 2016 by the authorities should not affect the declarations made by the petitioner in respect of the period from April, 2016 onwards. The contention of the respondents (Revenue) is that the investigation pertains to the period 2016–17 also and the respondents are yet to quantify and communicate the amount due. - . The Designated Committee is directed to decide the petitioner’s applications/declarations after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - HC
Rejection of SVLDR scheme - it is clear that any investigation pertaining to the period from 2014 to 2016 by the authorities should not affect the declarations made by the petitioner in respect of the period from April, 2016 onwards. The contention of the respondents (Revenue) is that the investigation pertains to the period 2016–17 also and the respondents are yet to quantify and communicate the amount due. - . The Designated Committee is directed to decide the petitioner’s applications/declarations after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
