Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Since assessee was having substantial reserve funds with it and the AO had merely gone by a presumption that investments were made out of borrowed funds disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) was not warranted - AT
Since assessee was having substantial reserve funds with it and the AO had merely gone by a presumption that investments were made out of borrowed funds disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) was not warranted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.