Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - Assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 54 since there is transfer of residential house property as observed hereinabove and for this part of the appeal, the assessee succeeds. Regarding the deduction claimed u/s 54EC assessee has not made the investment within stipulated time and this fact was also not examined by the AO - Revision order sustained on this issue. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - Assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 54 since there is transfer of residential house property as observed hereinabove and for this part of the appeal, the assessee succeeds. Regarding the deduction claimed u/s 54EC assessee has not made the investment within stipulated time and this fact was also not examined by the AO - Revision order sustained on this issue. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.