Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Insolvency and BankruptcySeptember 15, 2020Case LawsHC
Initiation of disciplinary proceedings - complaint against the IP by the petitioner - Regulation 7(3) of IBC - Merely informing the petitioner as has been done in the present case that appropriate action is being initiated in the matter, would not, therefore, satisfy the requirements of Regulation 7. The complainant was never informed whether respondent no.1 has formed an opinion in favour of the complainant or against him, on such complaint. - HC
Initiation of disciplinary proceedings - complaint against the IP by the petitioner - Regulation 7(3) of IBC - Merely informing the petitioner as has been done in the present case that appropriate action is being initiated in the matter, would not, therefore, satisfy the requirements of Regulation 7. The complainant was never informed whether respondent no.1 has formed an opinion in favour of the complainant or against him, on such complaint. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
