Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - violation of provision of section 269SS and 269T - Loan or deposits in Cash - Belief on the part of the assessee in view of the past history of the case that deposit/repayment by its members in cash is bonafide belief - Considering the bonafide and genuine transaction, reasonable cause in terms of section 273B of the Act, exist in the case of the assessee - Penalty deleted - AT
Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - violation of provision of section 269SS and 269T - Loan or deposits in Cash - Belief on the part of the assessee in view of the past history of the case that deposit/repayment by its members in cash is bonafide belief - Considering the bonafide and genuine transaction, reasonable cause in terms of section 273B of the Act, exist in the case of the assessee - Penalty deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.