Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Denying the benefit u/s 91 - Tax Credit - Income accrue in India - assessee being “Resident but not Ordinarily Resident" is not a “Resident in India” - persons who are ‘resident but not ordinarily resident’ in India are forming larger group of the persons who are ‘resident’ in India. - we reject the contentions of the revenue that benefit of section 91 (1) of the act does not apply to a person who is ‘not ordinarily resident’ in India. - AT
Denying the benefit u/s 91 - Tax Credit - Income accrue in India - assessee being “Resident but not Ordinarily Resident" is not a “Resident in India” - persons who are ‘resident but not ordinarily resident’ in India are forming larger group of the persons who are ‘resident’ in India. - we reject the contentions of the revenue that benefit of section 91 (1) of the act does not apply to a person who is ‘not ordinarily resident’ in India. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
