Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - Textile Broker - allegation that appellant facilatated in inflating the FOB value for the purpose of wrongly claiming higher DEPB benefits - it is found that this appellant have facilitated the main accused M/s J.S. Designer Ltd. and its Directors in inflating FOB value of goods for export, by justifying the cost, indirectly - Levy of penalty confirmed (reduced from ₹ 25 lakhs to ₹ 7,50,000/- ) - AT
Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - Textile Broker - allegation that appellant facilatated in inflating the FOB value for the purpose of wrongly claiming higher DEPB benefits - it is found that this appellant have facilitated the main accused M/s J.S. Designer Ltd. and its Directors in inflating FOB value of goods for export, by justifying the cost, indirectly - Levy of penalty confirmed (reduced from ₹ 25 lakhs to ₹ 7,50,000/- ) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
