Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Valuation - undervaluation - “Polo” and “Vento” models of their car - related party transaction - interconnected undertakings - Mutuality of Interest - It is found that the transaction value is not determined by the appellant, but the transfer value claimed to be the true transaction value is determined by the Planning Round, every year which is headed by M/s VWAG, Germany. - if corporate veil is pierced then we find that the entire operations of manufacture and sale of these vehicle was throughout on account of M/s VWAG, Germany. - By application of Rule 11, in case of related person transactions the value needs to be determined by application of Rule 9 - AT
Valuation - undervaluation - “Polo” and “Vento” models of their car - related party transaction - interconnected undertakings - Mutuality of Interest - It is found that the transaction value is not determined by the appellant, but the transfer value claimed to be the true transaction value is determined by the Planning Round, every year which is headed by M/s VWAG, Germany. - if corporate veil is pierced then we find that the entire operations of manufacture and sale of these vehicle was throughout on account of M/s VWAG, Germany. - By application of Rule 11, in case of related person transactions the value needs to be determined by application of Rule 9 - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.