Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Disqualification of petitioners to act as Director - Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 - the counsel for the petitioners has been unable to show as to what part of the cause of action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. - The writ petition deserves to be dismissed with exemplary costs. - HC
Disqualification of petitioners to act as Director - Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 - the counsel for the petitioners has been unable to show as to what part of the cause of action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. - The writ petition deserves to be dismissed with exemplary costs. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
