Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice issued to a company which is non-existent on the date as it stood amalgamated with the appellant/petitioner - ts conduct of filing return of income in the name of OAS after the amalgamation and obtained refunds issued in the name of OAS, which will all go to show that M/s.OAS continued to exist even after amalgamation. - Therefore, appellant cannot canvass the point that OAS was nonexistent and the proceedings initiated in its name would be bad in law. - HC
Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice issued to a company which is non-existent on the date as it stood amalgamated with the appellant/petitioner - ts conduct of filing return of income in the name of OAS after the amalgamation and obtained refunds issued in the name of OAS, which will all go to show that M/s.OAS continued to exist even after amalgamation. - Therefore, appellant cannot canvass the point that OAS was nonexistent and the proceedings initiated in its name would be bad in law. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
