Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Offences u/s 276C(2) and 278B - allegation against the Petitioners is that they wilfully concealed the income - Where the documents were left out to be marked due to carelessness and ignorance, it could be allowed to be marked for elucidation of truth, in the interest of justice, by exercising powers u/s 391 of Cr.PC. - the Petitioners should be allowed to let in additional evidence subject to provisions of Chapter XXIII of Cr.PC in the presence of the Respondent/ complainant and his counsel. - HC
Offences u/s 276C(2) and 278B - allegation against the Petitioners is that they wilfully concealed the income - Where the documents were left out to be marked due to carelessness and ignorance, it could be allowed to be marked for elucidation of truth, in the interest of justice, by exercising powers u/s 391 of Cr.PC. - the Petitioners should be allowed to let in additional evidence subject to provisions of Chapter XXIII of Cr.PC in the presence of the Respondent/ complainant and his counsel. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.