Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Penalty u/s. 271D - violation of section 269SS - father using the money of his son - the money has been given by the son to the father and that have been used by the father for tiding over urgent business requirement cannot be termed as loan/advance, so it cannot attract the penalty u/s. 271D.
Penalty u/s. 271D - violation of section 269SS - father using the money of his son - the money has been given by the son to the father and that have been used by the father for tiding over urgent business requirement cannot be termed as loan/advance, so it cannot attract the penalty u/s. 271D.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.