Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Penalty u/s. 271D - violation of section 269SS - father using the money of his son - the money has been given by the son to the father and that have been used by the father for tiding over urgent business requirement cannot be termed as loan/advance, so it cannot attract the penalty u/s. 271D.
Penalty u/s. 271D - violation of section 269SS - father using the money of his son - the money has been given by the son to the father and that have been used by the father for tiding over urgent business requirement cannot be termed as loan/advance, so it cannot attract the penalty u/s. 271D.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.