Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Profiteering - restaurant services - allegation that benefit of reduction in GST rate not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - contravention of section 171 of CGST Act - since the recipients of the benefit, as determined, are not identifiable, the respondent is directed to deposit the amount in two equal parts in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the Maharashtra State Consumer Welfare Fund.
Profiteering - restaurant services - allegation that benefit of reduction in GST rate not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - contravention of section 171 of CGST Act - since the recipients of the benefit, as determined, are not identifiable, the respondent is directed to deposit the amount in two equal parts in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the Maharashtra State Consumer Welfare Fund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
