Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Profiteering - restaurant services - allegation that benefit of reduction in GST rate not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - contravention of section 171 of CGST Act - since the recipients of the benefit, as determined, are not identifiable, the respondent is directed to deposit the amount in two equal parts in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the Maharashtra State Consumer Welfare Fund.
Profiteering - restaurant services - allegation that benefit of reduction in GST rate not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - contravention of section 171 of CGST Act - since the recipients of the benefit, as determined, are not identifiable, the respondent is directed to deposit the amount in two equal parts in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the Maharashtra State Consumer Welfare Fund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
