Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Revision u/s 263 - the head of assessee’s income derived from its holiday homes i.e. whether it is income from house property as per the PCIT, business income going by the AO in assessment and the CIT(A) and the residuary had of “other” sources in its computation; respectively, is purely a debatable issue. - Assumption of jurisdiction u/s 263 is not proper.
Revision u/s 263 - the head of assessee’s income derived from its holiday homes i.e. whether it is income from house property as per the PCIT, business income going by the AO in assessment and the CIT(A) and the residuary had of “other” sources in its computation; respectively, is purely a debatable issue. - Assumption of jurisdiction u/s 263 is not proper.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.