Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Revision u/s 263 - Capital gain computation - On both the issues i.e (i). applicability of sec. 50C to the transfer transaction under consideration; and (ii). verification of cost of acquisition/improvement of the property in question, which had been adopted by the A.O as the A.O had failed to make necessary inquiries and verifications, therefore, the Pr. CIT in our considered view had rightly exercised his revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act.
Revision u/s 263 - Capital gain computation - On both the issues i.e (i). applicability of sec. 50C to the transfer transaction under consideration; and (ii). verification of cost of acquisition/improvement of the property in question, which had been adopted by the A.O as the A.O had failed to make necessary inquiries and verifications, therefore, the Pr. CIT in our considered view had rightly exercised his revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
