Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Seeking exit from CIRP Process - Respondent No. 2 had arrived at a Settlement with the 'Corporate Debtor' - the factum of Respondents having inter se arrived at a Settlement prior to passing of the impugned order and constitution of the 'Committee of Creditors' is nothing but a ploy designed to defeat the legitimate interests of other stakeholders. This factual position is clearly borne out by the sequence of events unfolded by record. - Public interest would not warrant such course to be adopted.
Seeking exit from CIRP Process - Respondent No. 2 had arrived at a Settlement with the 'Corporate Debtor' - the factum of Respondents having inter se arrived at a Settlement prior to passing of the impugned order and constitution of the 'Committee of Creditors' is nothing but a ploy designed to defeat the legitimate interests of other stakeholders. This factual position is clearly borne out by the sequence of events unfolded by record. - Public interest would not warrant such course to be adopted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.