Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Seeking exit from CIRP Process - Respondent No. 2 had arrived at a Settlement with the 'Corporate Debtor' - the factum of Respondents having inter se arrived at a Settlement prior to passing of the impugned order and constitution of the 'Committee of Creditors' is nothing but a ploy designed to defeat the legitimate interests of other stakeholders. This factual position is clearly borne out by the sequence of events unfolded by record. - Public interest would not warrant such course to be adopted.
Seeking exit from CIRP Process - Respondent No. 2 had arrived at a Settlement with the 'Corporate Debtor' - the factum of Respondents having inter se arrived at a Settlement prior to passing of the impugned order and constitution of the 'Committee of Creditors' is nothing but a ploy designed to defeat the legitimate interests of other stakeholders. This factual position is clearly borne out by the sequence of events unfolded by record. - Public interest would not warrant such course to be adopted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.