Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CIRP - Reimbursement of Compounding fees - Who is responsible for offence or compounding of offence under the Income Tax Act which was committed much before the initiation of CIRP proceedings - In the instant case as per the prosecution Respondent No. 1 has committed the offence under section 276 -B read with Section 278-B of the Income-tax Act, therefore, he has filed the Application before the compounding authority. Liquidator has not committed the alleged offence therefore; he is not required to file Application before compounding authority accepting that he has committed an alleged offence.
CIRP - Reimbursement of Compounding fees - Who is responsible for offence or compounding of offence under the Income Tax Act which was committed much before the initiation of CIRP proceedings - In the instant case as per the prosecution Respondent No. 1 has committed the offence under section 276 -B read with Section 278-B of the Income-tax Act, therefore, he has filed the Application before the compounding authority. Liquidator has not committed the alleged offence therefore; he is not required to file Application before compounding authority accepting that he has committed an alleged offence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.