Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) - assessee has been taken the plea consistently that provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the I.T. Act, 1961, would not apply in the case of the assessee company because assessee company is maintaining the running transactions with its subsidiary company - deeming provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the I.T. Act, 1961, would not apply.
Deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) - assessee has been taken the plea consistently that provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the I.T. Act, 1961, would not apply in the case of the assessee company because assessee company is maintaining the running transactions with its subsidiary company - deeming provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the I.T. Act, 1961, would not apply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.