Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unabsorbed investment allowance - allowance u/s 32A (6) - AO had to see whether the assessee had fulfilled the conditions of section 32A(6) but he laid emphasis on the provisions of section 72A of the Act, which is misplaced. - The appellant has elaborately shown that the conditions specified in section 32A(6) of the Act are fulfilled by it. Therefore, the claim of the appellant is fully justified.
Unabsorbed investment allowance - allowance u/s 32A (6) - AO had to see whether the assessee had fulfilled the conditions of section 32A(6) but he laid emphasis on the provisions of section 72A of the Act, which is misplaced. - The appellant has elaborately shown that the conditions specified in section 32A(6) of the Act are fulfilled by it. Therefore, the claim of the appellant is fully justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.