Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Unabsorbed investment allowance - allowance u/s 32A (6) - AO had to see whether the assessee had fulfilled the conditions of section 32A(6) but he laid emphasis on the provisions of section 72A of the Act, which is misplaced. - The appellant has elaborately shown that the conditions specified in section 32A(6) of the Act are fulfilled by it. Therefore, the claim of the appellant is fully justified.
Unabsorbed investment allowance - allowance u/s 32A (6) - AO had to see whether the assessee had fulfilled the conditions of section 32A(6) but he laid emphasis on the provisions of section 72A of the Act, which is misplaced. - The appellant has elaborately shown that the conditions specified in section 32A(6) of the Act are fulfilled by it. Therefore, the claim of the appellant is fully justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.