Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
CENVAT Credit - it is absolutely clear that the appellant was not maintaining the separate accounts of inputs/input services despite manufacturing dutiable as well as exempted goods, however, were availing the cenvat credit on the common inputs, which definitely amounts violation of Rule 6 of CCR, 2004.
CENVAT Credit - it is absolutely clear that the appellant was not maintaining the separate accounts of inputs/input services despite manufacturing dutiable as well as exempted goods, however, were availing the cenvat credit on the common inputs, which definitely amounts violation of Rule 6 of CCR, 2004.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.