Penalty under Section 112 fails where knowledge, admissible statements, and incriminating evidence are not proved against the Customs Broker's directo...
Unexplained investment - Apparently the withdrawals from the bank account is made for meeting the expenses and not for keeping the money at house. Hence, the explanation of the appellant that cash of ₹ 5 lakhs is deposited out of savings is not supported by any documentary evidence and against the preponderance of probability and deserves to be rejected.
Unexplained investment - Apparently the withdrawals from the bank account is made for meeting the expenses and not for keeping the money at house. Hence, the explanation of the appellant that cash of ₹ 5 lakhs is deposited out of savings is not supported by any documentary evidence and against the preponderance of probability and deserves to be rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.