Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Condonation of delay - delay of 583 days - Due to subsequent developments wherein the assessee runs a serious risk of prosecution where the penalty is confirmed, he was advised to file the present appeals - there exists sufficient and reasonable cause for condoning the delay of 583 days in filing the present appeals where substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserved to be preferred. I
Condonation of delay - delay of 583 days - Due to subsequent developments wherein the assessee runs a serious risk of prosecution where the penalty is confirmed, he was advised to file the present appeals - there exists sufficient and reasonable cause for condoning the delay of 583 days in filing the present appeals where substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserved to be preferred. I
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.