Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Appeal decided ex parte - non-appearance on behalf of the assessee - though the assessee has not explained any plausible reason for non-appearance before the Tribunal, however, even if the impugned order is recalled for giving an opportunity to the assessee, no purpose will be served and it will be only an empty exercise as certain crucial facts have not been brought on record which requires to be verified by conducting a proper enquiry at the level of the A.O.
Appeal decided ex parte - non-appearance on behalf of the assessee - though the assessee has not explained any plausible reason for non-appearance before the Tribunal, however, even if the impugned order is recalled for giving an opportunity to the assessee, no purpose will be served and it will be only an empty exercise as certain crucial facts have not been brought on record which requires to be verified by conducting a proper enquiry at the level of the A.O.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.