Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Shares received by the appellant as gift - The chart reproduced in the Assessment Order clearly shows that it is not a gift but a family arrangement and these kind of family arrangement cannot be termed as gift/benefit or perquisite. AO by lifting the corporate veil, without providing any cogent reasons, and without appreciating that the beneficiary never obtained any benefit from this transaction at any time cannot comment on the said transaction as sham and bogus.
Shares received by the appellant as gift - The chart reproduced in the Assessment Order clearly shows that it is not a gift but a family arrangement and these kind of family arrangement cannot be termed as gift/benefit or perquisite. AO by lifting the corporate veil, without providing any cogent reasons, and without appreciating that the beneficiary never obtained any benefit from this transaction at any time cannot comment on the said transaction as sham and bogus.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
