Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Demand of CENVAT Credit by invoking extended period of limitation since process is not amount to manufacture - the erroneous payment of the appellant made as central excise duty was not detected by the department despite the appellant disclosing in their returns the details which they were mandatorily required to disclose. - Demand set aside.
Demand of CENVAT Credit by invoking extended period of limitation since process is not amount to manufacture - the erroneous payment of the appellant made as central excise duty was not detected by the department despite the appellant disclosing in their returns the details which they were mandatorily required to disclose. - Demand set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
