Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Expenditure allowable u/s 37 (1) - disallowance ‘Scholarship Expenses’ - incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the profession of the appellant or not - the appellant is a well known Supreme Court Lawyer. The agreement with Exeter College, the University of Oxford, exhibited hereinabove, is self-explanatory. - Claim of expenses allowed - AT
Expenditure allowable u/s 37 (1) - disallowance ‘Scholarship Expenses’ - incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the profession of the appellant or not - the appellant is a well known Supreme Court Lawyer. The agreement with Exeter College, the University of Oxford, exhibited hereinabove, is self-explanatory. - Claim of expenses allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.