Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - concealment of income - the conclusion of the AO that amount was not finding mention in the regular books of accounts is over-sweeping over statement, because the fact remains that the books of accounts were not “closed”, then as the year was yet not over - The year in the case of the assessee being the first year of operation, it cannot even be implied that that the amount pertained to earlier year(s) of its business. - No penalty.
Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - concealment of income - the conclusion of the AO that amount was not finding mention in the regular books of accounts is over-sweeping over statement, because the fact remains that the books of accounts were not “closed”, then as the year was yet not over - The year in the case of the assessee being the first year of operation, it cannot even be implied that that the amount pertained to earlier year(s) of its business. - No penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.