Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Provisional release of seized goods - The adjudicating authorities should be permitted to exercise their discretion in manner known to law. While exercising their discretion, they may also examine the statements made by the petitioner. Naturally, they would have to provide an opportunity to the petitioner of being heard. When the adjudicating authority is empowered even to reject provisional release of goods, unless such orders are passed by the adjudicating authority, this Court should not interfere with such process. - HC
Provisional release of seized goods - The adjudicating authorities should be permitted to exercise their discretion in manner known to law. While exercising their discretion, they may also examine the statements made by the petitioner. Naturally, they would have to provide an opportunity to the petitioner of being heard. When the adjudicating authority is empowered even to reject provisional release of goods, unless such orders are passed by the adjudicating authority, this Court should not interfere with such process. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
