Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
CENVAT credit - Capital Goods - allegation that plant erected at site are embedded to the earth and as such, such plant facilities cannot be considered as excisable goods for the purpose of availment of CENVAT credit on such disputed items - The denial of CENVAT benefit on the disputed goods should not stand for judicial scrutiny, as against rules framed in the CENVAT Statute - AT
CENVAT credit - Capital Goods - allegation that plant erected at site are embedded to the earth and as such, such plant facilities cannot be considered as excisable goods for the purpose of availment of CENVAT credit on such disputed items - The denial of CENVAT benefit on the disputed goods should not stand for judicial scrutiny, as against rules framed in the CENVAT Statute - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.