Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice for reopening is issued beyond a period of 4 years - There is no tangible material for the respondent to come to the conclusion that there is escapment of income from assessment. Moreover, there is no live link for formation of such belief while recording the reasons for reopening the assessment. - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice for reopening is issued beyond a period of 4 years - There is no tangible material for the respondent to come to the conclusion that there is escapment of income from assessment. Moreover, there is no live link for formation of such belief while recording the reasons for reopening the assessment. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.