Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Doctrine of Merger of an order - CIT(A) observed that the appeal has been merged with order of Revision passed by the CIT u/s 264 - Prohibition u/s 264(4) - the appeal of the assessee was pending before the Ld. CIT(A) during the relevant time when the matter was decided by the Ld. CIT u/s 264 - Therefore, the Ld. CIT under section 264 has exceeded his jurisdiction by passing the order which is not sustainable in the eyes of law. - Matter restored before CIT(A) - AT
Doctrine of Merger of an order - CIT(A) observed that the appeal has been merged with order of Revision passed by the CIT u/s 264 - Prohibition u/s 264(4) - the appeal of the assessee was pending before the Ld. CIT(A) during the relevant time when the matter was decided by the Ld. CIT u/s 264 - Therefore, the Ld. CIT under section 264 has exceeded his jurisdiction by passing the order which is not sustainable in the eyes of law. - Matter restored before CIT(A) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
