Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Doctrine of Merger of an order - CIT(A) observed that the appeal has been merged with order of Revision passed by the CIT u/s 264 - Prohibition u/s 264(4) - the appeal of the assessee was pending before the Ld. CIT(A) during the relevant time when the matter was decided by the Ld. CIT u/s 264 - Therefore, the Ld. CIT under section 264 has exceeded his jurisdiction by passing the order which is not sustainable in the eyes of law. - Matter restored before CIT(A) - AT
Doctrine of Merger of an order - CIT(A) observed that the appeal has been merged with order of Revision passed by the CIT u/s 264 - Prohibition u/s 264(4) - the appeal of the assessee was pending before the Ld. CIT(A) during the relevant time when the matter was decided by the Ld. CIT u/s 264 - Therefore, the Ld. CIT under section 264 has exceeded his jurisdiction by passing the order which is not sustainable in the eyes of law. - Matter restored before CIT(A) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.