Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Page of 4778
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 95557 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of fee u/s 234E - delay in furnishing TDS statements / returns - Challenging the vires of Section 234E - Revenue is right in contending that Section 234 (E) of the Act is not a penalty. Penalty is levied under Section 271 (H) and is not automatic. - Since the levy is constitutional, the challenge to the demand notices also fail - HC
Levy of fee u/s 234E - delay in furnishing TDS statements / returns - Challenging the vires of Section 234E - Revenue is right in contending that Section 234 (E) of the Act is not a penalty. Penalty is levied under Section 271 (H) and is not automatic. - Since the levy is constitutional, the challenge to the demand notices also fail - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.