Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Levy of fee u/s 234E - delay in furnishing TDS statements / returns - Challenging the vires of Section 234E - Revenue is right in contending that Section 234 (E) of the Act is not a penalty. Penalty is levied under Section 271 (H) and is not automatic. - Since the levy is constitutional, the challenge to the demand notices also fail - HC
Levy of fee u/s 234E - delay in furnishing TDS statements / returns - Challenging the vires of Section 234E - Revenue is right in contending that Section 234 (E) of the Act is not a penalty. Penalty is levied under Section 271 (H) and is not automatic. - Since the levy is constitutional, the challenge to the demand notices also fail - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.