Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Release of goods seized - the learned Single Judge failed to consider certain facts and directed the appellants to pass refund order in favour of the second respondent, which warrants interference of this Bench. It is not proved that all the seized properties were assessed in the name of the second respondent. - HC
Release of goods seized - the learned Single Judge failed to consider certain facts and directed the appellants to pass refund order in favour of the second respondent, which warrants interference of this Bench. It is not proved that all the seized properties were assessed in the name of the second respondent. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
