Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Revision u/s 263 - AO ought to have made mandatory reference to the “TPO” for determining arm’s length price - Since the Finance Act, 2017 omitted sec. 92BA(i) from retrospective effect, the Assessing Officer’s inaction in not making reference to the TPO does not render the assessment erroneous causing prejudice to interest of the Revenue.- AT
Revision u/s 263 - AO ought to have made mandatory reference to the “TPO” for determining arm’s length price - Since the Finance Act, 2017 omitted sec. 92BA(i) from retrospective effect, the Assessing Officer’s inaction in not making reference to the TPO does not render the assessment erroneous causing prejudice to interest of the Revenue.- AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.