Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Unexplained investment u/s 69 - CIT(A) has rightly adopted this view holding that provisions of section 50C were not applicable on the assessee being the purchaser of the property and also during the survey proceedings no documentary evidence was found which may prove that the assessee has made payment over and above the registered valuation of the property.
Unexplained investment u/s 69 - CIT(A) has rightly adopted this view holding that provisions of section 50C were not applicable on the assessee being the purchaser of the property and also during the survey proceedings no documentary evidence was found which may prove that the assessee has made payment over and above the registered valuation of the property.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
