Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Extraordinary writ jurisdiction cannot revive a time-barred statutory GST appeal merely because appellate limitation has expired.
    Natural justice in GST appeals requires a hearing and reasoned order; cryptic rejection was quashed and remanded.
    Consistency in export-service classification supports input tax credit refunds where identical services lack distinguishing features.
    Mandatory hearing before adverse GST determination protects natural justice; unconsidered replies invalidate resulting demand and appellate action.
    Deemed withdrawal of best-judgment assessment follows delayed return filing when the prescribed late fee is paid.
    Commensurate price reduction for input tax credit cannot be replaced by free upgrades, with GST and interest repayable.
    Statutory labelling and institutional-consumer packaging preserved GST exemption for frozen chicken cuts despite corporate names appearing on invoices...
    Scrutiny selection reasons need not be disclosed where a specific information notice is issued during assessment proceedings.
    Development-rights compensation may not accrue to landholders where contractual rights vest commercially in the developer, preventing double taxation.
    Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
    Interim judicial directions on LTC/LFC reimbursements prevented employer TDS default treatment and consequential interest liability.
    Real net winnings govern online gaming taxability, preventing gross wallet credits from being treated as taxable income.
    TDS credit follows taxable income, preventing a former proprietor from claiming deductions attributable to a successor partnership firm.
    Commercial expediency supports interest deductions where interest-free advances fund a wholly owned subsidiary's genuine group business project.
    Marketing expenditure substantiation may justify limited disallowance, but does not alone establish income misreporting for penalty purposes.
    Dealing-error and squared-off derivative losses qualify as allowable business losses when supported by contemporaneous transaction records.
    Prohibited versus restricted imports: provisional release remains available where tyre classification and compliance conditions await adjudication.
    RoDTEP duty credit for authorised restricted sugar exports cannot be denied where prescribed governmental conditions are fulfilled.
    Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
    Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Deduction u/s 54F - LTCG - Out of these 24 flats, 15 flats are...

      Assessee Eligible for Deduction on New Residential House as Proviso to Section 54F Does Not Apply.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxFebruary 11, 2020Case LawsAT
      Deduction u/s 54F - LTCG - Out of these 24 flats, 15 flats are already sold in the present year and remaining 9 flats are likely to be sold within the period of three years from the date of its purchase but the assessee is not claiming deduction u/s 54F in respect of any of these 24 flats but since even these 9 unsold flats can be considered as a part of new asset for deduction u/s 54F, the proviso (a) (i) to section 54F is not applicable because in addition to these 9 flats and one residential house purchased by the assessee for which the assessee is claiming deduction u/s 54F, the assessee is owning only one residential house being self-occupied house and hence, this proviso is not applicable.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax