Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - fresh assessment in the remand proceedings - AO not only maintained the earlier income but even the appeal instituted by the appellant against the same was withdrawn by the appellant. In such circumstances, we are unable to agree with the contentions of the appellant that at the stage of making order giving effect to the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals), there was necessity of making a fresh Order or there was a necessity of issuing a fresh notice for initiating the penalty proceedings.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - fresh assessment in the remand proceedings - AO not only maintained the earlier income but even the appeal instituted by the appellant against the same was withdrawn by the appellant. In such circumstances, we are unable to agree with the contentions of the appellant that at the stage of making order giving effect to the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals), there was necessity of making a fresh Order or there was a necessity of issuing a fresh notice for initiating the penalty proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.