Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - fresh assessment in the remand proceedings - AO not only maintained the earlier income but even the appeal instituted by the appellant against the same was withdrawn by the appellant. In such circumstances, we are unable to agree with the contentions of the appellant that at the stage of making order giving effect to the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals), there was necessity of making a fresh Order or there was a necessity of issuing a fresh notice for initiating the penalty proceedings.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - fresh assessment in the remand proceedings - AO not only maintained the earlier income but even the appeal instituted by the appellant against the same was withdrawn by the appellant. In such circumstances, we are unable to agree with the contentions of the appellant that at the stage of making order giving effect to the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals), there was necessity of making a fresh Order or there was a necessity of issuing a fresh notice for initiating the penalty proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.