Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The interest is evidently and explicitly payable under Rule 6(3A) clause (e) read with Rule 14 of CCR 2004. The interest has indeed been demanded under Rule 14 of CCR 2004. Merely because they have also not mentioned Rule 6(3A) in the Show Cause Notice, it does not vitiate the entire demand of interest.
The interest is evidently and explicitly payable under Rule 6(3A) clause (e) read with Rule 14 of CCR 2004. The interest has indeed been demanded under Rule 14 of CCR 2004. Merely because they have also not mentioned Rule 6(3A) in the Show Cause Notice, it does not vitiate the entire demand of interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.