Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO directed to call for record of the alleged agricultural land and find out whether it was an agricultural land not falling within the ambit of expression “capital asset” provided in Section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act. In case it is found that it was not a capital asset, then the assessee will not be visited with penalty
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO directed to call for record of the alleged agricultural land and find out whether it was an agricultural land not falling within the ambit of expression “capital asset” provided in Section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act. In case it is found that it was not a capital asset, then the assessee will not be visited with penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
