Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Misdeclaration of imported goods - the goods in question cannot be termed as ‘prohibited goods’ merely for misdeclaration in the Bills of Entry, for the purpose of imposing penalty u/s 112 - the Customs Duty sought to be evaded is nowhere quantified - Maximum penalty is ₹ 5000
Misdeclaration of imported goods - the goods in question cannot be termed as ‘prohibited goods’ merely for misdeclaration in the Bills of Entry, for the purpose of imposing penalty u/s 112 - the Customs Duty sought to be evaded is nowhere quantified - Maximum penalty is ₹ 5000
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
