Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Misdeclaration of imported goods - the goods in question cannot be termed as ‘prohibited goods’ merely for misdeclaration in the Bills of Entry, for the purpose of imposing penalty u/s 112 - the Customs Duty sought to be evaded is nowhere quantified - Maximum penalty is ₹ 5000
Misdeclaration of imported goods - the goods in question cannot be termed as ‘prohibited goods’ merely for misdeclaration in the Bills of Entry, for the purpose of imposing penalty u/s 112 - the Customs Duty sought to be evaded is nowhere quantified - Maximum penalty is ₹ 5000
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
